The raison d’être of the Ismaili Fatimid caliphate (909-1171 CE) was the establishment of a state where all its subjects, regardless of their religious affiliations and ethnic origins were to be governed with righteousness and justice. These aspirations reflect the perennial human quest for good order which have underpinned the earliest formation of civilisations and continue to be among the most significant markers of successful governance today. So, what is distinctive about the Fatimids? One of its distinctive characteristics is the model of leadership and governance which they espoused and its durability over two and a half centuries in lands that were historically inhabited by diverse confessional communities, and which were in the main non-Shia and have remained so to this day.
In claiming the leadership of the community, the Fatimids invoked the notion of supreme spiritual and temporal authority which they claimed to have inherited as the designated successors of Prophet Muhammad. Founding a state where the Fatimid sovereign would institute just governance and equitable social order had been the cornerstone of the Ismaili mission, which led to the establishment of the Fatimid state in North Africa in 909 CE..
In governing North Africa for over half a century (909-969 CE), the Fatimids had to translate their utopian notions of righteous rule into a pragmatic model of governance over a populace that was religiously and ethnically varied, and among whom were elements who were ideologically antagonistic to their minority rule. The Fatimid conquest of Egypt in 969 CE, added to the complexity as Egypt’s populace had a relatively greater indigenous ethnic and religious diversity. The longevity of the Fatimid reign, which lasted two and a half centuries, and its notable periods of stability and prosperity indicate that the dynasty was, by and large, able to foster a viable model of governance.
It is under the Fatimid Caliphate that Egypt first became the centre of a Mediterranean empire in the 10th Century CE. Fatimid Cairo became its administrative hub and a thriving cosmopolitan metropolis. It was in this time that Egypt first gained political and religious independence from the loci of Muslim authority in the East, which had previously been asserted by the Umayyads in Syria (661-750 CE) and subsequently by the Abbasids in Iraq (750-1256 CE). The Fatimids established their autonomy over Egypt following political as well as social and economic strife in the region.
Restoration of social, economic and political order was among the primary features of the proclamation of security which the Fatimid sovereign, Imam-caliph al-Mu’izz li-Din Allah, vouchsafed upon the Fatimid conquest of Egypt (Amandocument). It provided an instructive formulation of the Fatimid principles of governance. Invoking their claim to the universal imamate, it articulated the notion of protection as one that encompassed all their subjects, irrespective of their race, ethnicity or belief. It referenced this declaration to that of Prophet Muhammad and his provision of the protection over all the people of Medina, including its resident Jewish tribes, as recorded in the so-called Constitution of Medina.
The guarantee of safety stipulated the relationship between the new caliph and his subjects. In principle, it outlined the essential responsibilities of good governance. It promised economic reforms through a variety of means, including the maintenance of coinage and the elimination of metal impurities from them; facilitation of trade through the upkeep of roads; curbing brigandage; ensuring that laws of inheritance adhered to scriptural and prophetic norms, and ensuring that the state would regulate financial legacies. Essentially, it provided a reiteration of the safety that a Muslim ruler was required to provide for his community:
"I guarantee you God’s complete and universal safety, eternal and continuous, inclusive and perfect, renewed and confirmed through the days and recurring through the years, for your lives, your property, your families, your livestock, your estates and your quarters, and whatever you possess, be it modest or significant." 
This explicit declaration of the role and responsibility of the sovereign and his administration in the restoration of stability and prosperity became the yardstick of the efficacy of the Fatimid model of governance.
Governing Diverse Communities
While the provision of good governance provided the theoretical paradigm upon which the Fatimids legitimised their entry into Egypt, it is in the reign of Imam-caliph al-Aziz bi’llah (975-996), the first Fatimid sovereign to begin his reign in Egypt, that the precepts of governance stipulated in the AmanDocument were translated into state policy and incorporated into its institutional infrastructure. A study of selective features of his reign consequently provides a valuable backdrop for examining the early Fatimid approach to the governance of the various confessional communities that comprised the rubric of Egyptian life.
The judiciary in Imam-caliph al-Aziz’s reign provides an illustrative example of the negotiation between the Ismaili claim to supreme religious authority while maintaining the legal validity of the other Muslim schools of law, thus ensuring religious and social cohesion. On matters related to personal or family law, the jurists could pronounce judgement according to their preferred legal tradition, whether this was Sunni or Shi‘i, but on matters related to social governance and public order, their pronouncements had to be based on the Fatimid legal code.
The safeguarding of public order was also reinforced by ensuring that the most senior Fatimid officials personally administered the cases presented at the grievance courts. These sessions provided a formal mechanism for any subject to present a grievance against the state or its bureaucrats and to be vouchsafed justice on it from the highest officials of the Fatimid state.
Involvement of Christians and Jews
At this time, Egypt continued to possess sizeable and established indigenous Christian denominations, in particular, Copts, Melkites and Nestorians, as well as a number of Jewish communities including the Rabbanites and Qaraites. Over the centuries, their social and economic roles had become woven into the fabric of Egyptian society, particularly as seasoned bureaucrats and traders, medical professionals, gold and silversmiths, and money-lenders. The Aman declaration guaranteed that the customary regulations accorded to the People of the Book would be upheld. Imam-caliph Al-‘Aziz is known to have provided state support for the renovation as well as the upkeep of Christian houses of worship. He is noted to have permitted the Copts, the largest indigenous Egyptian Christian community to rebuild the Church of St. Mercurius near Fustat, despite its reconstruction being challenged by some Muslims.
Imam-caliph Al-‘Aziz also established familial relations with the Melkite Christian community, which had an established presence in Egypt and Syria. His life-long companion, the mother of the well-known Fatimid princess, Sitt al-Mulk, was a Melkite lady. Imam-caliph Al-‘Aziz appointed her two brothers, Arsenius and Orestes, as Melkite Patriarchs over Alexandria and Jerusalem respectively. Towards the later part of his reign, in 384 AH / 994 CE, Imam-caliph al-‘Aziz promoted the Christian bureaucrat ‘Isa b. Nestorius to assume responsibility for the overall administration of the state. ‘Isa, in turn, appointed the Jewish administrator, Manashsha b. Ibrahim, as the financial controller over Syria. The appointment of Christian and Jewish administrators to the senior most state positions demonstrated the Fatimid commitment to inclusive governance across their religious and ethnic populace.
Challenges related to Fatimid governance
The Fatimids faced challenges in instituting their governance over the religiously and socially stratified Egyptian society. This required them to develop a finely tuned balancing act in regulating their relationships with each of the significant communities. The sources reference specific incidents where different communities were held in check to ensure public order. The Fatimids also created legal and social frameworks that enabled people from various religious and ethnic communities to be involved in their administration. However, none of these communities were allowed to establish their total dominance. The appointment of a Jewish convert, Yaqub b. Killis to the post of Chief Minister in 368 AH by Imam-caliph al-Aziz is a case in point. The most famous of his chief ministers and arguably among the most competent administrators of his age, Yaqub was nonetheless temporarily dismissed from his post at the pinnacle of his power in 374 AH. He was arrested and imprisoned for actions that were considered to be a travesty of justice. While Yaqub was subsequently reinstated in his post and continued to occupy it until his death in 380 AH, his temporary banishment served as a salutary reminder to the Egyptian subjects of the imperative for the maintenance of just order.
Fatimid rule in Egypt posed its own challenges. Yet, judged by the yardstick of history, it is remembered in subsequent Muslim Egyptian historiography as a period of relatively peaceful prosperity and inclusive governance. While the circumstances leading to the recent events in North Africa and the Middle East are significantly different to their medieval counterparts, nonetheless, they reflect the ongoing human quest to develop a sustainable model of inclusive and equitable governance; however these terms are defined in their contemporary contexts.
 Ibn Zulaq (d. 997 CE) as quoted by al-Maqrizi (d. 1449 CE) in his Itti‘az al-Hunafa. For an annotated translation and analysis of the Aman Document see S Jiwa, "Inclusive Governance: A Fatimid Illustration," in A Sajoo ed. Companion to the Muslim World (London, 2009), pp. 157-175.